An LLM agent can inspect available corpora and tools in a new environment and build reusable resources such as indices, scripts or procedural guidance. The paper asks whether it can do that without a syllabus — before test time and without knowing the downstream task distribution — and choose how to prepare the environment.

Across six heterogeneous benchmarks, a meta-agent variant achieved the highest Avg@3 reward on five, while fixed corpus processing stayed best on the largest corpus benchmark. Larger study budgets did not reliably improve downstream reward.

The practical result: studied artifacts reduce the test-time sampling needed to reach a given score, shifting computation from repeated test-time attempts to a pre-task study phase.